palo gucci trademarks case | In Re Gucci, 193 B.R. 411 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) palo gucci trademarks case Therefore, in order to protect the interests of defendant in the "Gucci" name, Paolo is enjoined from using "Paolo Gucci" as a trademark or trade name. To *416 enable Paolo to exploit his . Explore the Allure fragrance collection for Women at CHANEL. Shop the full collection on Chanel.com and discover your signature scent.
0 · In Re Gucci, 193 B.R. 411 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
1 · IN RE: Paolo GUCCI (1997)
2 · Gucci v. Gucci Shops, Inc., 688 F. Supp. 916 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)
3 · Gucci v. Gucci Shops, Inc., 651 F. Supp. 194 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
4 · Gucci v. Gucci Shops, Inc., 651 F. Supp. 194
5 · Gucci v. Gucci Shops, Inc. Case Brief for Law School
6 · Gucci v. Gucci Shops, Inc.
7 · Gucci and the Ongoing Legal Battles Over the Family Name
8 · From Gucci to Knock
Chanel's Rouge Allure Luminous Intense Lip Color is the best red lipstick for day or night. The non-bleeding formula adheres to the skin while remaining non-drying. I use gloss or lipstick on a daily basis .
Therefore, in order to protect the interests of defendant in the "Gucci" name, Paolo is enjoined from using "Paolo Gucci" as a trademark or trade name. To *416 enable Paolo to exploit his . Defendant Gucci Shops has counterclaimed against plaintiff for trademark infringement and dilution, unfair competition, breach of a 1972 Guccio Gucci, S.r.l. .Paolo filed a lawsuit seeking a declaration that he has the right to use his name on products of the same type as those sold by Gucci Shops and requesting injunctive relief to prevent Gucci . While employed by Guccio Gucci, plaintiff designed various Gucci products. After his termination by Gucci Shops in 1980, plaintiff embarked on a career as an independent .
Defendant Gucci Shops has counterclaimed against plaintiff for trademark infringement and dilution, unfair competition, breach of a 1972 Guccio Gucci, S.r.l. Shareholders Agreement, .A July 1988 judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Conner, J.) prohibited him from using “Paolo Gucci” as a trademark, but allowed its use to . In this context, the court held that Paolo enjoined from using his family name alone as a trademark but was allowed to use Paulo Gucci to identify himself as the designer of .
On October 15, 1996, Bankruptcy Judge Gallet entered an order authorizing the Chapter 11 trustee (the “Trustee”) for the estate of Paolo Gucci et al., to sell Paolo Gucci .While employed by Guccio Gucci, plaintiff designed various Gucci products. After his termination by Gucci Shops in 1980, plaintiff embarked on a career as an independent designer of . When Paolo filed for chapter 11 in 1994, Guccio Gucci (the Gucci Company) submitted a bid to purchase the “Designed by Paolo Gucci” trademark.
In Re Gucci, 193 B.R. 411 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
Therefore, in order to protect the interests of defendant in the "Gucci" name, Paolo is enjoined from using "Paolo Gucci" as a trademark or trade name. To *416 enable Paolo to exploit his own talents and identity, however, he is entitled to use his name to identify himself as the designer of products sold under a separate trademark which does . Defendant Gucci Shops has counterclaimed against plaintiff for trademark infringement and dilution, unfair competition, breach of a 1972 Guccio Gucci, S.r.l. Shareholders Agreement, false designation of origin and abuse of process.Paolo filed a lawsuit seeking a declaration that he has the right to use his name on products of the same type as those sold by Gucci Shops and requesting injunctive relief to prevent Gucci Shops from claiming that his use of the name infringes upon their trademark rights.
While employed by Guccio Gucci, plaintiff designed various Gucci products. After his termination by Gucci Shops in 1980, plaintiff embarked on a career as an independent designer of consumer products. Plaintiff has identified the products of his design with his name and trademark "PAOLO GUCCI."Defendant Gucci Shops has counterclaimed against plaintiff for trademark infringement and dilution, unfair competition, breach of a 1972 Guccio Gucci, S.r.l. Shareholders Agreement, false designation of origin and abuse of process.
hermes sauna qingdao
A July 1988 judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Conner, J.) prohibited him from using “Paolo Gucci” as a trademark, but allowed its use to identify him as the designer of products under separate trademarks that did not contain the Gucci name. In this context, the court held that Paolo enjoined from using his family name alone as a trademark but was allowed to use Paulo Gucci to identify himself as the designer of products marketed under a different mark with a disclaimer that he was no longer affiliated with any of the GUCCI entities. On October 15, 1996, Bankruptcy Judge Gallet entered an order authorizing the Chapter 11 trustee (the “Trustee”) for the estate of Paolo Gucci et al., to sell Paolo Gucci trademark and licensing rights to appellees, Guccio Gucci, S.p.A. and Gucci America Inc.While employed by Guccio Gucci, plaintiff designed various Gucci products. After his termination by Gucci Shops in 1980, plaintiff embarked on a career as an independent designer of consumer products. Plaintiff has identified the products of his design .
When Paolo filed for chapter 11 in 1994, Guccio Gucci (the Gucci Company) submitted a bid to purchase the “Designed by Paolo Gucci” trademark.Therefore, in order to protect the interests of defendant in the "Gucci" name, Paolo is enjoined from using "Paolo Gucci" as a trademark or trade name. To *416 enable Paolo to exploit his own talents and identity, however, he is entitled to use his name to identify himself as the designer of products sold under a separate trademark which does . Defendant Gucci Shops has counterclaimed against plaintiff for trademark infringement and dilution, unfair competition, breach of a 1972 Guccio Gucci, S.r.l. Shareholders Agreement, false designation of origin and abuse of process.
Paolo filed a lawsuit seeking a declaration that he has the right to use his name on products of the same type as those sold by Gucci Shops and requesting injunctive relief to prevent Gucci Shops from claiming that his use of the name infringes upon their trademark rights.
While employed by Guccio Gucci, plaintiff designed various Gucci products. After his termination by Gucci Shops in 1980, plaintiff embarked on a career as an independent designer of consumer products. Plaintiff has identified the products of his design with his name and trademark "PAOLO GUCCI."Defendant Gucci Shops has counterclaimed against plaintiff for trademark infringement and dilution, unfair competition, breach of a 1972 Guccio Gucci, S.r.l. Shareholders Agreement, false designation of origin and abuse of process.A July 1988 judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Conner, J.) prohibited him from using “Paolo Gucci” as a trademark, but allowed its use to identify him as the designer of products under separate trademarks that did not contain the Gucci name. In this context, the court held that Paolo enjoined from using his family name alone as a trademark but was allowed to use Paulo Gucci to identify himself as the designer of products marketed under a different mark with a disclaimer that he was no longer affiliated with any of the GUCCI entities.
On October 15, 1996, Bankruptcy Judge Gallet entered an order authorizing the Chapter 11 trustee (the “Trustee”) for the estate of Paolo Gucci et al., to sell Paolo Gucci trademark and licensing rights to appellees, Guccio Gucci, S.p.A. and Gucci America Inc.While employed by Guccio Gucci, plaintiff designed various Gucci products. After his termination by Gucci Shops in 1980, plaintiff embarked on a career as an independent designer of consumer products. Plaintiff has identified the products of his design .
IN RE: Paolo GUCCI (1997)
hermes so pink picotin
 .jpg)
hermes savate
Product Description. ALLURE SENSUELLE is another olfactory interpretation of the ALLURE fragrance. A voluptuous variation with an intriguing and magnetic sensuality. A floral-soft-ambery fragrance that is revealed in a unique way on each woman. Because every woman has her own special allure.
palo gucci trademarks case|In Re Gucci, 193 B.R. 411 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
